Is it fair that I cannot sit on a jury? - i the jury 1982 rapidshare
I am 44 years and was a taxpayer all my life. I am a citizen who obeys the law, pay their taxes in any way they are, has a full-time job and takes care of a couple with a disability. I was drinking in the RAF for 4 years service in Northern Ireland in 1983 and in the Falkland Islands in 1982 but due to 2 minutes it took me a year in jail for 17 years, I can never, never felt that a jury or with something that requires the reporting involved. How can it ever be justified?
Thursday, February 18, 2010
I The Jury 1982 Rapidshare Is It Fair That I Cannot Sit On A Jury?
7 comments:
There should be a time limit for disclosure of crime. Although it is doubtful that he "was drunk Honor," a defense cut
I do not know who you are.
They are excluded from the jury, though;
(i) is a sentence of probation in the last five years, or;
(ii) the sentences in the last ten years or has served
(iii) you have more than five years in prison had been in her life.
You are not under either, so I can see.
Well, I must accept that this question is not really fair, but the other part of me, a bit cynical, me, why it seem as a bad thing.
Jury service is, frankly, a lot of ball track.
You sound like a good guy well, and unfortunately, you are neither the first nor the last to his regret over the loss of a few minutes.
I am totally see where you come from, but legally, I suppose, because it is much easier to say that anyone with a criminal record who know where to draw the border, what exactly should the alleged "criminal activity disable it for a jury.
It's unfair, but I think how much time and money should be spent if the case should each be evaluated not only by the radical decision to anyone with a criminal record.
It is the law, end of story. In reality, they are missing. I was quoted twice. The first time was not selected. I was elected last month, had one days free to work, sit in an hour, until he, allegedly, was organized, then someone said he had not been published. We have discharged all and told to return later than 3 hours later. When the trial began and lasted for approximately 1 hours before it abandoned for lack of evidence.
What WSTE time and money. The court had lost all board members for travel and income. All this for nothing.
What happens if you do not get to ask me?
OK if you say that's not right, but the answer to your question, that if I know, because it depends on the nature of the crime.
or, rather, in this case it is not fair, but people who have committed, should have child abuse, rape and murder and horrific crimes like this have no rights. the same basic human rights. But you should be COS crime was not so bad.
From what you say, I do not think it can be justified. Everyone makes mistakes. But it would be interesting to know what he was in the "two minutes drunks" who done it deserves to be beat for 12 months. My opinion, and we agree that it might be wrong is that the crime had involved violence very seriously.
Post a Comment